KEYTAKEAWAYS
- Stablecoins are evolving from crypto assets into payment and settlement tools
- Visa is entering as an advisory and infrastructure provider, not a stablecoin issuer
- Competition among payment networks is shifting toward control over usage paths and settlement structures
CONTENT
Rather than issuing a stablecoin, Visa is positioning itself within the payment and advisory layer that shapes how stablecoins enter the mainstream financial system.
MEASURED ENTRY, DEEPER POSITIONING
In December 2025, Visa launched its Stablecoins Advisory Practice through Visa Consulting & Analytics (VCA), offering banks, credit unions, and fintech companies strategic, compliance, and technical advisory services related to stablecoin adoption.
At a time when stablecoins are increasingly being discussed, tested, and in some cases issued by financial institutions, Visa chose not to launch its own stablecoin or directly participate in on-chain financial activities. Instead, it positioned itself at the advisory and payment-infrastructure layer. This approach allows Visa to avoid direct exposure to the credit, reserve, and regulatory responsibilities associated with stablecoin issuance, while remaining involved in the critical stages of stablecoins entering the mainstream financial system.
Structurally, Visa’s point of entry is not at the asset level but at the application and settlement-path level. The core question it is addressing is not who issues stablecoins, but how they are used and through which networks they are settled. Advisory services provide a practical mechanism to engage with these questions.
STABLECOINS AS PAYMENT TOOLS
The changing functional role of stablecoins is a key backdrop to Visa’s move.
In earlier phases, stablecoins primarily served crypto trading and on-chain financial activities, with use cases largely confined within the crypto ecosystem. As concerns around cross-border payment costs, settlement efficiency, and transaction finality have intensified, stablecoins have increasingly been evaluated for their potential role in real-world payment systems.
Visa has previously used USDC for cross-border settlement in live business contexts, validating its operational feasibility and efficiency. From Visa’s perspective, stablecoins are increasingly viewed less as speculative crypto assets and more as payment technologies.
As a result, industry discussion has shifted. The focus is no longer solely on whether stablecoins pose risks, but on how they can be integrated into existing payment and settlement processes within established regulatory and compliance frameworks.
PROVIDING A CONTROLLED ENTRY FOR TRADITIONAL FINANCE
For most traditional financial institutions, the primary challenges associated with stablecoins are not technical in nature, but stem from governance and responsibility boundaries.
Regulatory compliance, anti-money-laundering controls, custody arrangements, and client liability definitions constitute the most complex aspects of stablecoin deployment. Even institutions with sufficient technical capabilities face difficulties in advancing without clear operational precedents.
Visa’s stablecoin advisory offering does not require institutions to immediately issue stablecoins or fully integrate on-chain finance. Instead, it supports evaluation, use-case design, and pilot programs within existing regulatory constraints. This incremental approach allows institutions to explore stablecoin applications while maintaining risk control.
In this process, Visa functions primarily as a coordinator and interpreter rather than a driver of aggressive innovation.
RE-ANCHORING THE PAYMENT NETWORK PATH
From a longer-term perspective, Visa’s stablecoin advisory initiative extends beyond a simple expansion of consulting services.
As blockchain-based settlement capabilities mature, the core issue facing payment networks is not whether they will be displaced, but whether they will remain embedded in dominant settlement paths. If stablecoins become widely used for payments, the role payment networks play in that process will directly affect their long-term relevance.
By participating early in the design of stablecoin payment structures, Visa ensures that settlement and payment flows remain compatible with its existing network. This form of involvement is not overt, but it introduces meaningful path dependency at the implementation stage.
Compared with competing for transaction volume after stablecoins are widely adopted, influencing the design of settlement paths earlier aligns more closely with the long-term strategy of an infrastructure-focused payment network.
DIVISION OF ROLES BETWEEN STABLECOINS AND SOVEREIGN MONEY
At a macro level, stablecoin development also intersects with the uneven progress of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).
Current trends suggest that CBDCs are more suited to sovereign monetary functions and state-level settlement systems, while stablecoins offer greater flexibility in commercial payments and cross-border transactions. Rather than being substitutes, the two are more likely to coexist across different layers of the financial system.
Visa’s positioning within this structure avoids direct involvement in currency issuance. Instead, it operates as an intermediary connecting commercial payments, financial institutions, and technical systems. This allows Visa to remain engaged in the evolution of payment infrastructure without encroaching on monetary sovereignty.
CONCLUSION
Overall, Visa’s launch of a stablecoin advisory practice represents a measured, infrastructure-oriented strategy rather than an aggressive transformation.
By avoiding the uncertainties associated with stablecoin issuance while remaining active in application, settlement, and integration layers, Visa has embedded itself within the structural evolution of payments. As stablecoins move closer to mainstream financial usage, Visa is already positioned within the relevant pathways.
Whether stablecoins achieve large-scale adoption may depend less on individual issuers and more on how effectively they are integrated into existing financial and payment systems. From this perspective, Visa’s approach reflects a long-term, steady strategy rather than a short-term market response.
Read More：
Tether’s Role Upgrade: A Crypto Financial Hub Beyond Stablecoins
